Put tongue in my pussy

As a fact there no longer exists any trace of this infamous practice since the establishment of the Spanish rule, ... but even to-day a Bisayo feels vexed to find his wife safe from suspicion, because he concludes, that not having excited the desire of anyone, she must have some bad quality which will prevent him from being happy with her.’ [12] _i.e._, a legalised defilement or ravishing. Blondeau, in his _Dictionnaire erotique latin-francais_ (Liseux: Paris, 1885), translates _stupratio_ as “a combat in which one forces a beauty to yield to one’s passion ... to take possession of the honour of some pretty woman ... the struggle in which women succumb with pleasure.” _Stupro_, the verb; _stuprator_, the noun; and _stupratus_, the adjective have kindred meanings. “On the Malabar Coast, also, there were Brahmins whose only religious office was to gather the virgin flower of young girls. These latter used to pay them for it, without which they could not find husbands. The King of Calicut himself used to grant the right of the first night to a Brahmin; the King of Tamassat grants it to the first stranger who arrives in the town; whereas the King of Campa reserves to himself the _jus prim? noctis_[13] for all the marriages in the kingdom. (_De Gubernatis, Histoire des voyageurs italiens aux Indes Orientales_: Livourne, 1875.) [13] An old established practice whereby newly married women are deflowered by others than their husbands, whether by priest, lord, or stranger. To discuss this relic of feudalism would be beyond the scope of a note; it is summed up briefly in the idea that the lord of a put tongue in my pussy domain was entitled to exact tribute from his subjects in the form of intercourse with every bride on the fantasy girl pussy fuck hard first night of her marriage.

Karl Schmidt’s _Jus Prim? Noctis (The Law of the First Night)_, the most comprehensive treatise on the subject. “Warthema says that the King of Calicut, when he took a wife, chose the most worthy and learned Brahmin to deflower put tongue in my pussy the maiden; for this service he received from 400 to 500 crowns. At Tenasserim fathers used to beg of their daughters to allow themselves to be deflowered by Christians or Mohammedans. “Pascal de put tongue in my pussy Andagoya, who visited Nicaragua between 1514 and 1522, says that it was usual for a grand-priest to lie during the first night with the put tongue in my pussy bride, and Oviedo, (1535), speaking of the Acovacks and other American nations, relates that the wife, in order that the marriage should be happy, passed the first nuptial night with the priest or _piache_, and Gomarra, (1551), relates the same thing of the inhabitants of Cumana. “In Europe, young girls who are not very virtuous, and who have studied all the various forms of flirtation, are most generally passed off as virgins when they marry. Even when it does not really exist, there are many ways by which a virginity--which perhaps has been sold over and over again by expert and clever procuresses--can be simulated. A little time before going to the nuptial bed, the girl inserts into her vagina a few drops of pigeon’s blood; or in some cases she selects for her wedding day the last day of menstruation. A sponge, skilfully placed, allows the blood to flow at the moment of the catastrophe, when a sudden ‘Oh!’ put tongue in my pussy announces to the unsuspecting husband that the temple has been violated for the first time, and that the veil of the _sanctum sanctorum_ has really been rent by him. Add also to these methods injections so astringent that, at the required time, they will give to a prostitute, whose gap has been widened by a thousand customers, a tightness greater than that of a real virgin.” The more one examines the question, the more one is convinced that virginity or chastity has come to be regarded as a spiritual and moral asset only in civilised, or comparatively civilised, society. “In considering the moral quality of put tongue in my pussy chastity among savages,” writes Havelock Ellis (_Studies in the Psychology of Sex_, vol.

147), “we must carefully separate that chastity which among semi-primitive peoples is exclusively imposed upon women. This has no moral quality whatever, for it is not exercised as a useful discipline, but merely enforced in order to heighten the economic and erotic value of women.

“Many authorities believe that the regard for women as property furnishes the true reason for the widespread insistence on virginity in brides. Ellis, speaking of the West Coast of Africa (_Yoruba Speaking Peoples_, pp. 183 _et seq._), says that girls of good class are betrothed as mere children, and are carefully guarded from men, while girls of lower class are seldom betrothed, and may lead any life they choose.” Virginity in woman, it seems, has been set on a pedestal unsupported by history, science, or investigation.